How information is handled

How TCGame checks, updates and corrects safety information.

The policy explains which sources receive priority, how uncertain details are presented, and how practical tools are reviewed.

Updated 7 July 2026Primary sources preferredCorrections recorded when needed

Source order

TCGame starts with the organisation responsible for the topic. Government portals are used for cybercrime and consumer routes, NPCI and bank material for payment safety, and Android or CERT-In documentation for app and device security.

  1. Government and public authorities: reporting routes, safety advisories and consumer services.
  2. Payment networks and banks: UPI PIN use, transaction states and dispute procedures.
  3. Device and operating-system documentation: Play Protect, permissions, app removal and security settings.
  4. Service documentation: used for features controlled by that service.
  5. Secondary reporting: used cautiously when primary material is unavailable.

How uncertainty is shown

A public source cannot reveal a private account ledger, withdrawal queue or identity check. Where those records are unavailable, the wording separates the visible fact from the missing information and points to the organisation that can inspect it.

Verified

Backed by a primary source or directly observable behaviour.

Current

Checked against an active source on the stated update date.

Limited

Some useful facts are available, but private records cannot be inspected.

Unverified

The available evidence is not enough to state the claim as fact.

Practical writing rules

  • Separate facts, warning signs and recommended next actions.
  • Use exact transaction terms such as pending, successful, failed and reversed.
  • Do not ask readers to share passwords, OTPs, PINs or unredacted documents.
  • Do not treat a logo, familiar colour scheme or message sender as proof of identity.
  • Explain when a bank, platform or public authority is the correct record holder.
  • Use examples that can be followed without exposing private account data.

Local tool checks

Interactive tools are tested for clear labels, keyboard use, mobile layout and predictable output. Their role is to organise a decision or record; they do not predict game results, approve payments or determine whether a platform is trustworthy.

Updates and corrections

A review is needed when an official source moves, a reporting procedure changes, Android behaviour changes or a sentence could give the wrong impression. Significant corrections should be reflected in the affected page’s update date and wording.

External links

Links are selected for verification, reporting or device help. Readers should still check the final destination before entering personal information, because external sites control their own content and privacy practices.

Common questions

Questions about sources and updates

Which sources receive priority?

Government, payment-network, bank, Android and other first-party documentation receive priority for the topics they control.

How are unclear account or withdrawal details handled?

The visible facts are separated from the private records that only the platform or payment provider can inspect.

How are outdated instructions corrected?

The source, route or technical step is reviewed, the wording is updated, and the visible update date is changed when the correction is material.